UFC on Fox 2 will probably be remembered as a more important (or at least more interesting) moment in the UFC's growth than the debut in November of 2011. The event was the promotion's first full effort on Fox and, while featuring several "big name fighters," failed to live up to the excitement expected of a UFC card in many ways. The ratings for this show are interesting given how horrible the opening fight between Demian Maia and Chris Weidman were but will also have some weight in terms of if viewers will tune in to the next Fox card.
The Fox Sports Media Group distributed an press release via e-mail with their official ratings information and they weren't shy about noting the drop in ratings from the first go-round:
The three-bout, two-hour event, the first official network broadcast of FOX's partnership with UFC, is off from the UFC on FOX premiere in November (3.5/6), which was only one hour and featured a highly anticipated heavyweight championship fight. When comparing similar time periods for the two events, FOX posted a 3.1/5 from 9:00-10:15 PM ET, compared to the 3.5/6 that the premiere event recorded from 9:00-10:00 PM.
It is interesting to note that, as expected with an event on free TV, the ratings increased dramatically for the main event:
As anticipation to the night's main event grew so did the ratings. The night's first match, Jitsu master Demian Maia taking on unbeaten Chris Weidman did a 2.3/4. The next fight between middleweight contender Chael Sonnen battling British star Michael Bisping grew to a 2.9/5. Fans tuned in to see former light heavyweight champion Rashad Evans take on undefeated former national champion wrestler Phil Davis with that bout posting a 3.4/6. The fight went all five rounds and Evans defeated Davis by unanimous decision.
They also shared some "top market" breakdowns:
The top five metered markets for Saturday's UFC on FOX event are: Las Vegas - 4.1/8; Louisville - 4.1/7; Indianapolis - 3.9/7; Greenville - 3.9/6; Tulsa - 3.9/6; and Knoxville - 3.9/6. Other markets of interest: New York - 2.2/4; Los Angeles - 2.3/5; and host city Chicago - 2.8/5.
The fact that there are multiple fights with a main event that will almost always be more appealing to the coveted "casual fan" does mean that the ratings will show a lot of fluctuation as fights that don't hold interest result in people checking out for 20-30 minutes at a time. From talks I've had with industry types, they've told me that it can make selling ads tricky given that sponsors can be reluctant to pay for ad slots which may fall during low viewership points in the broadcast (or for spots during the main event which may come after a quick knockout).
But, given that the ratings for the show were so much higher than the other major networks and the lack of a "season" meaning that the UFC can fill a Saturday night slot any month of the year, there is certainly no immediate worry that sponsors or the network will shy away from the fight game any time soon. Simply that it's going to take skill and commitment to line up the best, highest paying sponsors possible. But Fox is no stranger to that game.
0 recs | 18 comments
2.8 in Chicago?
Is it normal for the host city to have significantly lower ratings?
menckenstein - January 30, 2012
Oops, 2.8/5 not 8
Not bad, then, especially when compared to NY and LA. Good job UFC.
menckenstein - January 30, 2012
What is the /X number signify?
Cocytus - January 30, 2012
I misunderstood the Nielsen thing slightly, but wikipedia has this which makes more sense:
menckenstein - January 30, 2012
Not bad
SSreporters - January 30, 2012
wat
Kid Kimura - January 30, 2012
Could someone explain these numbers to me?
MattParker117 - January 30, 2012
Seconded
AHutch - January 30, 2012 via mobile
42
Cory Braiterman - January 30, 2012
man
i really hope that the ufc has a great fight on fox soon.
i would not call any of the fights total stinkers (i missed the maia/weidman one) but there hasn’t been a great fight yet either.
bad decision to leave guida/henderson off that first fox card! they dropped the ball there for sure.
Clifford J - January 30, 2012
do you not realize how long of a deal UFC and fox have...
the Great fights will come just like the bad ones do
inthepipes - January 30, 2012
sooooooooo
does that mean they peaked around 12million people for the main event?
eddyreyna2 - January 30, 2012
Compared to what Fox usually gets on Saturdays...
and it killing an important demo, I’m sure everyone involved is happy with these numbers.
It’s a new era of network TV, as pointed out, networks will have to be creative to maximize these numbers with new approaches to advertising, but these numbers are significant, especially in key demos.
ChicagoMMAFan - January 30, 2012
To bring in really good numbers they’ll need either championship fights in popular weight classes or to march out their most popular fighters.
Unfortunately this deal came a little to late for Liddell, Couture, and Griffin to carry some of the early shows.
The UFC really needs to put some fast paced high energy fights on Fox to bring in the eyeballs.
NateDouble - January 30, 2012
These are really good ratings
Things seem to be doing just fine
Stiff Jab - January 30, 2012
not bad although you would've think the ratings would be better for bigger markets such as NY & LA.
daftshadow - January 30, 2012
These numbers are ALL meaning less since the nelson rating system is flawed and no longer reflects actual viewer with the sampling they have.
williambonney - January 30, 2012
the opposite of what i expected
surprised people weren’t tuning out in droves after weidman-maia
Cunny - January 30, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Bloody Elbow to post a comment.