The cover photo for Tucker's second book was actually taken by Mac Danzig, TUF 6 winner. Photo via TuckerMax.com
After reading a Forbes.com profile of Tucker Max, a controversial Internet star who'd turned into an absurdly successful physical book author, I noticed that a very brief quote about the good qualities of MMA was almost buried into the piece. I reached out to Tucker in hopes of getting a few quick blurbs about the positive mention of MMA in a mainstream media publication and then mashing the whole thing together as a short post here on Bloody Elbow.
Tucker ruined those hopes by bouncing back and forth with me in a Q&A session that ranges from describing his discovery of the sport, the move to direct participation and the many connections he made with professionals and friends. The five-part interview is nearly 4500 words long and is interspersed with many highly passionate and profound thoughts at the positive experiences and values combat sports have for him and their applicability to others.
The first part of the interview dealt with his discovery of Brazilian jiu jitsu, subsequent humbling and the transition into training MMA at the original incarnation of Legend's in Hollywood, California. This second part looks a bit deeper into his actual training and moves us to Tucker's present, while I start to ask questions about what he gets from the sport.
This interview is done partly in support of his latest books, Hilarity Ensues and Sloppy Seconds, yet the interview is 100% Tucker, 100% relevant to MMA and there is no advertising or review thing going on here. Max was genuinely surprised by me reaching out and by my questions and welcomed the chance to talk about something other than his debauchery. I present his answers exactly as written (minus the bleeping out of a few cuss words). The books hit stores today and can be ordered online as well.
Hit the jump for the second of five parts encompassing Tucker's experiences and views on mixed martial arts, as told in his unique voice and featuring brief glimpses of some very prominent MMA fighters and figures.
Part One: Discovery of BJJ, The Jump to MMA, Training at Legend's in Hollywood, CA.
Part Three: Swimming in Deep Waters and Coming Out Alive
Part Four: The Exact Space MMA Occupies in his Life
Part Five: The Inside Story on Jeremie Myers and What Max Wants From MMA

Ben Thapa: How is it that Reggie Warren was able to get you to a competence point inside a year in which you could spar relatively well and we see MMA fighters who never pick up striking well?
Tucker Max: First off, he didn't make me a great boxer or anything, that obviously takes years, he basically just made into a mediocre MMA striking partner. That's not remotely the same thing. But that being said, I did learn very fast, much faster than most I think, and it was for two reasons:
1. Reggie has a very good understanding of technique, and from the beginning I specifically asked Reggie to focus on this with me and correct EVERY mistake I made, even if that meant he corrected me every five seconds. This is for a reason; the way the human brain learns, if you really take the time at the beginning and focus on perfecting your technique, it takes longer, but you form the correct neural pathways first.
This provides two benefits: You don't have to unlearn wrong habits, and your technique holds up under high stress situations because you imprinted the right habits. And yes, I read way too much neuroscience, but its cool when you apply it in real life. I think that's a big problem with fighters--they learned wrong striking techniques early or somehow developed bad habits, and either can't or won't unlearn them and relearn the correct way, because that's very difficult, and they don't have anyone in their camp that forces them to do that. It's not that they can't be good strikers; it's that they won't put in the right type of work.
2. Reggie would constantly keep my training at the edge of my competency, which accelerated my learning. In the literature, this is called "deliberate practice" and what it means in practice is that as I got better, Reggie increased his technique load or work load or his responses in sparring with me, so I was never just doing what I was good at; instead he was constantly pushing me just a little further to the edge of what I was able to do. It's the same concept behind progressive load weight training--you get better by adding weight. It takes a good teacher to do this right, and he is really f***ing good.
I guess there was one other thing that helped: I was only doing striking at the time, because I had a partially torn ACL from MMA and couldn't roll (which I later fully tore while having sex, that story is actually in Hilarity Ensues), so I was able to focus just on striking and train with him 3-4 times a week. That helps, of course.
BT: Where do you train now?
TM: I live in Austin, Texas now, and I split my time training between two places: a Relson Gracie affiliate run by Christy Thomas (and Phil Cardella, though he just left to open a place in Florida), and a new place that just started, a Gracie Humiata affiliate run by Donald Park. Both Christy and Donald are friends of mine and both their academies are great places to train, and I would recommend either to anyone interested.
The only thing that sucks now is that its tough to get true MMA specific instruction here, the way that I had it in LA. There just aren't many people who have enough experience in MMA to be effective teachers of it at this point, so in Austin, I kinda have to do everything separate; gi, no-gi, boxing, muay thai, and wrestling are pretty much all from different instructors or even different gyms. There are good teachers here for each specific thing, but I didn't realize how lucky I was in LA to have the MMA teachers who were full time MMA fighters and could put it all together the way that Mac did.
Austin has some amazing MMA fighters that train out of here. I've either seen at the gym or trained with Tim Kennedy, Kamal Shalorus, Yves Edwards and Roger Huerta in Austin. But none of them teach; MMA has gotten to the point where the big guys like this are getting paid enough they don't have to teach people like me anymore. That's cool for them, but kinda sucks for me. But whatever, its not like I'm training for a fight, it's not a big deal, there are still world class teachers here, I can't complain. Even though I guess I just did.
BT: Have you competed as an amateur or professional in any MMA? If so, did you do well or draw a positive experience from that?
TM: No man, no Mickey Rourke/Jose Canseco s**t for me. Tons of sparring of course, but never a real MMA fight. You know whats funny is, even when I was training 4-5 days a week at Legends, it never really occurred to me to actually take a full-on fight. I guess because I was training with so many guys who were all so good, and I was clearly not at their level, it never occurred to me to do it as well. I just had fun training with them, and that was enough for me.
I love MMA as a hobby, but thats very different than doing it seriously enough to take sanctioned fights. I'm not foolish enough to think I can train casually and then be ready to do a serious fight. That's ridiculous. Serious MMA competition--even at low levels--is a full time job, and a very hard one. One of the things I love about the way I train MMA is that I don't have to be totally serious about it, that I can take a day or even a week off, and it doesn't matter. It's my hobby, I love it as a hobby; I don't want to make it my job. You know the saying, "Marry your mistress, and you create a vacancy." I never wanted to do that.
End of Part Two
Part One: Discovery of BJJ, The Jump to MMA, Training at Legend's in Hollywood, CA.
Part Three: Swimming in Deep Waters and Coming Out Alive
Part Four: The Exact Space MMA Occupies in his Life
Part Five: The Inside Story on Jeremie Myers and What Max Wants From MMA
Stay tuned to Bloody Elbow as Parts Three to Five will appear daily until the end of the week (2/10/12).
18 comments
Great write up.
Really like the fact that he was no illusions about wanting to take MMA beyond just being a hobby. I’ve been there, where you have a fun hobby but then trying to take the interest beyond that just ruins the fun experience.
squaresphere - February 7, 2012
For those that might think his neuroscience comments is pseudoscience babble, he's mostly right.
One of the top MMA trainers in the game, Greg Nelson of Minnesota MMA likes to tell his fighters ‘Practice makes Habit’. You can practice techniques perfectly, but those techniques might be perfectly wrong.
Generally it does take a lot longer to unlearn bad habits in order to learn good habits. 2 weeks of doing something wrong might take 6 months to correct.
KJ Gould - February 7, 2012
Yeah, he was actually spot on with the neural pathways bit.
lolumad - February 7, 2012
I don't want to be a jerk
but are either of you guys a neuroscientist or cognitive scientist? Because if not I guess you’re not really qualified to judge whether or not that’s pseudoscience babble. It’s pretty clear that unlearning bad habits is harder than learning them, but to speak of “neural pathways” (whatever that might mean in this context) or any other particular mechanism is unjustified. Of course that’s not to say it’s incorrect, just that you’re probably in no position to assess that.
High Roller - February 7, 2012
That's why I said 'mostly' right.
KJ Gould - February 7, 2012
Fair enough.
I simply dislike it when people invoke “neuroscience” to enhance the apparent credibility of whatever claim they’re making about brains or behaviour.
As far as what neuroscience has to say about this, we actually know very little about the specific mechanism of how brains learn. We have plenty of facts and a few hypotheses but no widely accepted comprehensive theories. So I would be suspicious of anyone that claims to have knowledge about this.
High Roller - February 7, 2012
Neural Pathways? Where did he mention one?
Yes. This is pseudoscience babble.
An MMA coach is NOT a scientist, that was the least credible statement I’ve read on this site in a while (well, these discussion boards do get hairy so that’s only partially true.) Nevermind, the person who stated he agreed with the “Neural Pathways” wins that shortbus award.
Stating some ill conceived personal conclusion about the way you’ve observed learning to work best is NOT peer reviewed science, and it is NOT the neuroscience I’ve come to know and love. There was
1. No reproducible or testable statement on biochemical transitions in memory storage, and (most importantly),
2. NOTHING that Tucker nor KJ said that even qualifies as knowledge from the physical or biological sciences.
And yes. I am qualified to tell you that. Please people, refrain from stating your observations on SOCIOLOGY or PSYCHOLOGY as NEUROSCIENCE. Because your lack of intellect on the topic will scream out for those who learned better in their first day of medical or laboratory studies.
beersnbroads - February 8, 2012
lol
Good interview, and I understand some people didn’t like the length of you previous articles, but now this is too short lol…2 questions!
Great job though
Fedorable - February 7, 2012 via mobile
I'm sorta stuck
between the two extremes.
I think I’ll break up the Camarillo and Freimuth interviews into three, rather than five.
Ben Thapa - February 7, 2012
5 is fine for Tucker Max
Gives us content Monday to Friday. :)
KJ Gould - February 7, 2012
Poll
I think it would be funny if the article polled how many BEers would tune in to watch Tucker Max fight an MMA fight.
Robert V-U - February 7, 2012
I'd tune in
as long as he was matched up with a striker who would jiggle his brain into unconsciousness.
Ak.Death - February 7, 2012
haha imagine if he won
Robert V-U - February 7, 2012
Randy could take him down and spank him for a while.
WheelieMonkey - February 7, 2012
Randy would throw him around like KZ vs Fedor I think.
I probably would only tune in if the match were for charity. Otherwise I’d just catch it later on youtube
Robert V-U - February 7, 2012
despite Max's bad (good to some?) rep
this has been a solid interview
sorakray - February 7, 2012
Max’s take on MMA is detailed and easy to relate to. The guy is clearly intelligent and has more exposure to MMA than most people.
However, it’s hard to look past all that he has chose to represent last decade. I think anyone who is as misogynistic as Max should be ignored. That’s not a legitimate reason to be famous, and admitting that he was a huge asshole and that he still is an asshole does not make the way he treats people more acceptable. For the most part, I think Max deserves all the criticism and scorn, but at the end of the day it’s kind of meaningless because he’s still gonna be Max and people are still going to pay attention
Robert V-U - February 7, 2012
for all the douchiness there is (and there is a lot)
he has always come off as a highly intelligent person
Kevin Jennison J. Zametov-St Pierre - February 7, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Bloody Elbow to post a comment.